Dam and waterside retaining embankment delivery · Data Quality Requirements
- Lifecycle status
- Candidate
- Content maturity
- Authored methodology
- Current version
- 0.1.0Last updated
- Readiness
- Review required
Methodology and translation states come from the source record; publishing this website does not change their review status.
Content languages
zh-CN · Aligned
Status, classification and source details
Readiness
- Warnings methodology_not_reviewed Authored methodology is candidate guidance and still requires methodology review.
Classification mapping
CPC 3.0:53233 · exact
Source
Data Quality Requirements
| requirement_id | Applies to | Requirement | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| identity_scope | reference entity and routes | Require site, actual purpose, geometry/datum, hydraulic/retaining conditions, route, complete component schedule and signed acceptance; comparison needs compatible functions and interfaces. | cp_handover; as-built survey |
| source_units | all measurements and identities | Maintain material states and actual public reference properties/unit groups; validate each supplier geography/voltage/route/gate and Chinese public name. No generic cement strength, sand grade, fuel density or life. | certificates, calibration, actual supplier/gate evidence |
| coverage | full construction period | Include all selected work packages, subcontractors, tests, rework, temporary installation/use/removal, site/borrow production, stocks and actual exports. Identify absent versus not measured; quantify uncertainty and missing upstream links. | work-package reconciliation; quantity/water balances |
| review_limits | construction and environmental interpretation | Historical sources are qualitative route evidence only. Actual specifications and current competent acceptance records govern this project. LCA checks do not certify dam safety; unresolved identities, shared-asset denominators and unquantified land/noise/ecology pathways remain declared limitations. | original sources and independent methodology review |
9. Validation Rules
| rule_id | applies_to | rule | source_ids |
|---|---|---|---|
| complete_reference | declared dataset | One accepted entity output equals the declared reference product name and 1 item, with actual site, surveyed geometry, route, hydraulic/retaining purpose and complete permanent interfaces. No cost-, average-mass-, lifetime- or energy-output substitute. | un-cpc-dams-2025 |
| inventory_unit_gate | declared dataset | Each selected exchange is one physical/chemical flow with its correct type, material state, direction and unit; verified identities require exact primary property and supplier/route/compartment fit. Treat non-applicable with evidence, never aggregate labels or silent omission. | usace-concrete-civil-works-1994 |
| quantities_and_shares | declared dataset | Reconcile each route material/stock/reject ledger, fill geometry and moisture/density measurements, energy and water balances, real transport legs and serialized reusable shares. Unknown H, unproved conversion or inconsistent reference denominator makes the dataset incomplete and requires review. | usace-embankment-dams-2004 |
| releases_and_fates | declared dataset | Verify actual fuel origin and measured species/size/phase/compartment. Captured effluent and sludge cannot masquerade as pure water. Distinguish construction removal from later demolition, and unknown release from zero. Missing required measurements or identities remain inconclusive; do not claim full lifecycle, safety or methodological approval. | epa-concrete-washout-2012 |
10. Published Dataset Profile
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| dataset_role | foreground_dataset |
| downstream_use | secondary_dataset; background_dataset |
| allowed_use | Construction handover comparison of functionally compatible dam entities at compatible sites/routes/interfaces; verified linked construction-stage input for later water-service/generation models |
| excluded_use | Full-life storage/generation factor; generic per-kg/metre/capacity dam burden; default reservoir emissions; safety, current compliance or methodology approval |
| required_metadata | Complete reference qualifiers; actual structural route/geometry; physical quantities/material states; site/time/supply gates; process/component interfaces; measurement/protocols; upstream links; lifecycle stages |
| required_quality_disclosure | Coverage by actual route, errors/uncertainty; identity gaps, unmeasured releases, unquantified land/noise/ecology, unknown asset H and missing upstream stages; acceptance records do not imply LCA approval |
| update_trigger | Actual scope/type/geometry/material-source/construction-period or measurement correction; changed component/burden interfaces, identities or quality evidence |
11. Data Sources
| Source id | Type | Reference | Used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| un-cpc-dams-2025 | official_guidance | UNSD, CPC Version 3.0 Explanatory Notes, 30 June 2025, printed/PDF p. 280, 53233 and adjacent 53232/53234. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/Download/In%20Text/CPC_Ver_3.0_Exp_Notes_30Jun2025.pdf | Entity/category boundary; no quantitative inventory evidence. |
| usace-embankment-dams-2004 | official_guidance | USACE EM 1110-2-2300, General Design and Construction Considerations for Earth and Rock-Fill Dams, 30 July 2004; §§5-1, 6-1–6-3, 9-2, 9-10; PDF pp.35–36,39,63,68; printed 5-1–5-2,6-1,9-1,9-6. https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-2300.pdf?ver=2014-04-07-145941-947 | Historical documented foundation, zoned fill, seepage and field-control/as-constructed practices; no design values or current approval generalized. |
| usace-concrete-civil-works-1994 | official_guidance | USACE EM 1110-2-2000, Standard Practice for Concrete for Civil Works Structures, 1 February 1994, publisher file includes Change 2 of 31 March 2001; §§7-6–7-8,9-1,9-4; PDF pp.68,70,80,88; printed 7-6,7-8,9-1,9-9. https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-2000.pdf | Historical conventional hydraulic concrete preparation, vibration/curing and quality verification; excludes RCC, repair and shotcrete. No recipe/temperature/strength thresholds adopted. |
| usace-rcc-dams-2000 | official_guidance | USACE EM 1110-2-2006, Roller-Compacted Concrete, 15 January 2000; §§6-1–6-4,6-8; PDF pp.46,48,50,54; printed 6-1,6-3,6-5,6-9. https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-2006.pdf?ver=2013-09-04-070814-530 | Historical RCC dam batching, transport, spreading/compaction and joint/waterstop practices; no numerical lift/recipe/productivity adopted. |
| cedd-seawalls-2026 | official_guidance | Hong Kong CEDD, Port Works Design Manual Part 4, Guide to Design of Seawalls and Breakwaters, April 2026 e-version; §§2.3.1–2.3.5,4.5.1–4.5.2, PDF pp.15–16,27, printed pp.13–14,25. https://www.cedd.gov.hk/filemanager/eng/content_89/p4_combined.pdf | Qualitative actual retaining-bank, block/caisson, rock armour, seabed dredging/replacement and conditional foundation-treatment operations only; harbour wave-protection/berthing needs separate category review. No universal HK specification, fuel grade, emission factor or lifetime. |
| epa-concrete-washout-2012 | official_guidance | US EPA, Stormwater Best Management Practice: Concrete Washout, EPA 833-F-11-006, February 2012, pp.1–2. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-11/documents/concretewashout_0.pdf | Historical process description supports water/slurry/solids containment and actual treatment/reuse interface; no assumed chemistry, pH threshold, recycling percentage or approval. |
| ipcc-flooded-land-2019 | official_guidance | IPCC, 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4 Chapter 7 Wetlands, §7.3, Table 7.7 and origin/pathway distinctions, PDF pp.6–7 / printed 7.6–7.7. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/pdf/4_Volume4/19R_V4_Ch07_Wetlands.pdf | Conditional gas origin/pathway and baseline/attribution review for actual pre-acceptance inundation only; national annual defaults and 20-year categories are not applied directly to this construction event, and establish neither lifetime nor inevitable emissions. |
Historical documents support documented operations and collection structure, not current local mandatory requirements. All mixtures, physical quantities, energy, losses, geometry, hydraulic conditions, life/reuse denominators and emission parameters require actual project evidence; this PCR supplies no default quantitative ranges.
Raw downloads
These files are byte-identical to the canonical files for this revision in the repository.
Complete field inspector
Loads this record’s complete manifest and structured projection on demand; values are never truncated. Requires JavaScript.